WAKE UP CALL FOR THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY: Effect of flawed DP – 2034, on Christian community and their institutions;

Mumbai: Poisar church parishioners take protest to BMC ward office

IMG-20160618-WA0011

Aggrieved with the BMC proposal to remove the heritage cross and portion of the graveyard for expansion of SV Road at Poisar in Kandivali, the members of Catholic community protested outside the local BMC office on Saturday.

Around 500 people marched from Our Lady of Remedy Church in Kandivali to the R-South BMC office as the community members were against the idea of dislodging the cross and parting away with the graveyard area. Protestors were holding placards with message to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC).

‘We are the BMC – Boulder Mighty Catholics’ read one of the placards, while another one said ‘Standing hand in hand to protect every inch of our land’.

Dolphy D’souza from Save our Land (SOUL), one of the supporting groups, said, “The protest is against the unjust demand of the BMC to demolish the heritage cross, a portion of the graveyard of Our Lady of Remedy which has a history of over 450 years and some of the other church property. We, Christians, are soft targets and so the politicians and BMC officials are exploiting us.”

Though the rally was peaceful as the protestors reached the R-South BMC ward office they started shouting slogans like, ‘BMC ki dadagiri nahi chalegi, nahi chalegi’ and ‘Ajoy Mehta hai, hai’.

A delegation of the protestors were allowed inside the ward office to meet the civic officials, but the members were upset as senior civic officials — the deputy municipal commissioner (DMC) and assistant municipal commissioner (AMC) — were not there for the meeting. It was the Executive Engineer, R-South, Sunil Pabikar who attended the delegation members and heard their say on the issue.

“DMC and AMC have gone for a top level meeting,” Pabikar told the protestors. He further informed the delegation that since the subject is very sensitive it would be appropriate to meet higher civic authorities and possibly municipal commissioner Ajoy Mehta to get the subject addressed.

With civic elections scheduled early next year, the community is likely to take up the issue during the polls and their anger could well be reflected in votes. Alfi Quinny from Poisar village said, “We may be a minority, but collectively, we make up 20 per cent of the electorate and a difference of 500 votes can make or break a candidate. The tide is rising against those in power who are crushing us in the name of development. The Poisar church makes everyone passing this road say a prayer, on the curses of the dead nothing good can come about.”

Meanwhile Godfrey Pimenta from Watchdog Foundation said, “We did a study of various points on SV Road from Mulji Nagar Junction in Kandivali to Kamal Kunj in Goregaon, the road width is not more than 60 feet anywhere. Why is there a need for a 90 feet road near Poisar Church? By taking a part of the graveyard, the dead will be desecrated. There is no burial ground nearby and many have to go as far as Oshiwara, this existing one is also being denied.”

“We need to thank the BMC and politicians for teaching our community to come on the streets. We have learnt to agitate with protests like this only because of them. Today’s morcha was only a trailer, if the BMC does not back off, we will have an even bigger agitation, We will have an agitation at Azad Maidan soon and also try to get an appointment with Ajoy Mehta to discuss this issue as well as the new Development Plan (DP) which has again targeted us by showing our properties as something else,” said D’souza.

***************

 

ST. ANTHONY CHURCH, MALWANI; MISSING FROM CURRENT DP;

EXTRACT CHURCH IN THE PLAN 1991 EXTRACT CHURCH IN THE PLAN

The analysis of revised draft Development Plan 2034, by us reveals that in all out of 90 Churches in city of Mumbai, only 10 Churches have been officially marked in DP.

1) 30 Churches are marked as Primary and Secondary Schools.

2) 2 Churches are marked as Rehabilitation and Resettlement for slums.

3) 1 Church is marked as Multipurpose Community Centre.

4) 1 Church is marked in No Development Zone.

5) 2 Churches are marked in Industrial Zone.

6) 1 Church is marked as Municipal Staff Quarters.

7) 2 Churches are marked as Graveyards.

8) 2 Churches are marked as Garden/Park.

9) 1 Church is marked as Municipal Housing.

10) 5 Graveyards are marked as Schools.

IF 1000 PLUS STAFF OF BMC AT HEADQUARTERS AND WARD OFFICE LEVEL WERE INVOLVED IN SURREY AND PREPARATION OF REVISED DP, THEN HOW COME SUCH LARGE NUMBER OF CHURCHES HAVE BEEN MARKED WRONGLY???

IS THIS NOT INTENTIONALLY DONE TO WIPE OUT OUR HISTORY AND OUR EXISTENCE AS MINORITY COMMUNITY.

THE STATE GOVERNMENT AND BMC OWES AN EXPLANATION TO THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY.

Watchdog Foundation,
Bombay East Indian Association,
Save Our Land,
Sahar Citizens Forum,
Civic and Political Cell Chuim Church,
Guardians United,

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: