Fitting Response from SILENT VOICE, to a LEGAL NOTICE Served By BISHOP……

After following matter was posted on SILENT VOICE, we received many inquiries from our readers. Some wanting to know what the Notice is about; some just assured to standby in support.

Attempt to Muzzle Voice of TRUTH has begun…

However, there is appropriate time for every action; which we think is now; to reveal details of this Notice.

The following post has rattled the powers that be, and has woken them from the slumber, when the avalanche hit them.

Otherwise everything was okay with them and maintained studied silence over it.

It was decided to close this Chapter, which had lasted for over Five years, with publication of the following post. However, it was not how LORD JESUS CHRIST wanted it to be, perhaps because the whole TRUTH was not out yet. He therefore, kindled the Devil into reaction, which he did, and here it is, the matter has been reopened.

We do not know, how far it will go. But with the support pledged by our readers, we are prepared for any eventuality.

BECAUSE THE TRUTH, THE GREATEST VALUE OF CHRISTIANITY, IS ON OUR SIDE.

They concealed FACTS to hide the TRUTH; we reveal FACTS to EXPOSE THEIR LIES: SUBVERTER OF TRUTH, ELEVATED AS BISHOP;

The following post was the beginning of this episode.

VM : 007/2012. PARISH PRIEST PRONOUNCED GUILTY OF CORRUPT PRACTICES.

 

P. S.:    It seems a trend has been emerging among Clergy, to take legal recourse and silence the voice of resentment. Some parishioners from St. Dominic Saviao Church, Wadala (E), have received Show Cause Notice from Parish authorities, for repeatedly writing letters seeking answers to some questions. Instead of giving a LISTENING HEAR to them, parish authorities chose to take legal recourse. It is needless to say, the notice has been responded to, in appropriate manner and copy of the same has been sent to Cardinal Oswald Gracias, Archbishop of Bombay. This matter is pending with SILENT VOICE, which shall be taken up shortly.

GREG

LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE GOOD SHEPHERD

He told them this parable. “Which of you men, if you had one hundred sheep, and lost one of them, wouldn’t leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and go after the one that was lost, until he found it? When he has found it, he carries it on his shoulders, rejoicing. When he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost!’ I tell you that even so there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents, than over ninety-nine righteous people who need no repentance.”

— Luke 15:3-7, World English Bible

GOOD SHEPHERD

OUR REPLY TO THE LEGAL NOTICE

To,                                                                                                                                4th, February, 2014

Ishwariprasad A. Bagaria,

Advocate, High Court,

A – 306, Third Floor, Ramji House,

Jambhul wadi, Dhobi Talao,

Mumbai – 400002;

Gentleman,

Sub:     Your Letter dated January, 28, 2014;

I have gone through your subject notice and would like to clarify as under:

  1. I am aware of the position your Client holds at present as well as the position he was holding prior to the present one.
  2. Yes, I am having a Blog Sight which is named as “Silent Voice” on the internet as owner of the site. I am publishing articles in the said blog site which are read by the public at large.
    1. The Blog highlights news about the Church activities, particularly from Archdiocese of Mumbai, both good as well as not so good. It is the right of every practicing Catholic to know the happenings within the Church, to which the blog caters.
    2. 3.      I deny the allegation by your client that I have published the news article, “with intention and willingly with ulterior motive in order to lower the image of your Client”. Your Client is well aware of “Silent Voice, even prior to becoming a Bishop.

 

a)      As regards to, “Staunch Defender of Corruption……… “, it is related to his Letter in the Examiner of July, 25th, 2011, in context of another Letter in the Examiner during April 2011. It is written By Dr. (Sr.) Mudita Menona Sodder, RSCJ; who is also a religious like your client and an Educationist, under the caption,” CHURCH NEED AN ANNA HAZARE”. The article condemns the corrupt activities within the Church. Your client, while defending corruption with various quotes from scriptures, has stepped further by calling her scoundrel; “Don’t try to reform others, change yourself and there will be one scoundrel less in the world to be changed”. This certainly implies that he is the STAUNCH SUPPORTER OF CORRUPTION WITHIN CHURCH. Both these letters did appear on SILENT VOICE, along with Editor’s views, on 9th, July, 2012 under the caption, VM. 12/2012, CORRUPTION WITHIN CHURCH, TWO DIFFERENT VIEW POINTS.  Your client did not have any reservation about it then lest felt something defamatory about that was written, then why this sudden volte face?

VM. 12/2012 : CORRUPTION WITHIN CHURCH, TWO DIFFERENT VIEW POINTS

  1. 4.      I deny that imputations made against your client are false and untrue with calculated mind to lower the image, reputation and prestige of your client.

The Article referred to, in the subject matter of your letter, also contain a letter, addressed to Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias, dated 10th, September, 2012, explaining the anomalies, deliberately now we perceive. Your client has violated the greatest value of Christianity, the TRUTH, which he is supposed to uphold. This amounts to SUBVERSION OF THE TRUTH. The letter certainly must have been forwarded to your client by Archbishop. But it never saw the light of the day, because it would have then exposed your client’s malicious motive. Therefore it was published in the form of an article, after over a year on 1st, January, 2014 under caption, “They concealed FACTS to hide the TRUTH; we reveal FACTS to EXPOSE THEIR LIES: SUBVERTER OF TRUTH, ELEVATED AS BISHOP”.

  1. Just as your client has received phone calls from his well wishers and feels that his reputation is being affected in public at large; we too have been receiving calls from members of Catholic community, concerned about the corruption within Church, appreciating us for bringing out the TRUTH.
  2. 6.      As regards to your demand for tendering an unconditional Apology, it is your client, who owes me an apology, for maligning my name by associating it with the person encroaching on Church Property without any iota of evidence….. Excerpt from AEC Judgment: Conclusion By AEC:       Even his allegations that Mr. Karveer paid some money to Mr. Fredrick Gracias in order to allow him to resurface the road on the plot bearing CTS No. 1668/1688 has fallen flat. Rather, the evidence on hand shows that Mr. Greg Pereira is the one who is close to Mr. Karveer and has helped him in getting some of the Church plots for development, as mentioned by Mr. Karveer himself.

 

Here, your client has exceeded his brief of conducting an impartial inquiry, in spite of taking an oath, by placing his hand on HOLY BIBLE. When questioned about this, during my meeting with Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias, he said.” The inquiry was about Fr. Ajit Bandekar, therefore, there is no question about your name being dragged as accused, the inquiry was ordered on your complaint”.

Just for your Information Mr. Advocate:

The Catholic Church comprises of two Components; Clergy and Laity.  Your client falls in the category of Clergy, who are supposed to look after spiritual needs of the Laity, to the category, which I belong to. The Laity look upon the Clergy as Shepherd to the flock, which is Laity.

I maintain that whatever I have said is the plain and simple TRUTH and I stand by it. MAY BE, TRUTH IS BITTER FOR YOUR CLIENT.

Has your client fulfilled his duty of Good Shepherd, as desired by LORD JESUS CHRIST? Please ask your client.

GREGORY R. PEREIRA (GREG)

Copy to:   1. HOLY FATHER, Pope Francis.

2. H. E. Cardinal Oswald Gracias: Archbishop of Bombay: This Letter is in Response to a Legal Notice Served on us by the recipient Advocate, on behalf of BISHOP DOMINIC SAVIO FERNANDES

COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE

LEGAL NOTICE FRON BP SAVIIOLEGAL NOTICE FROM BP SAVIO PG 2

LEGAL NOTICE FROM BP SAVIO PG 3LEGAL NOTICE FROM BP SAVIO PG 4

Advertisements

12 Comments

  1. February 25, 2014 at 9:48 am

    Mr. Greig donrt wory I am with you , so far we too at Mira Road trying to follow the heirarchy thru the channel for all this corr uption by the Parish Priest and now it comes to the fore even these Bishops are hand in glove with them, I think its time now we the faithful have to come on the road in the open and bring the truth out in the public.

    Like

  2. February 25, 2014 at 10:35 am

    They say that evil works in various ways.

    Firstly being from St. Josephs church Mira road East, most of hvae read the posts out forth by Robert D’souza. All of them were letters that were sent to the Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias These letters were handed over to Rev. K.T.Emanuel. After a long saga of being extremely busy Cardinal gave the members of the group including Mr. Robert a date to meet him., During the meeting he reveled that he had no idea about the problems we were facing in Mira Road Parish. he pretended that he was just not aware and the very fact that the group met him he beginning to learn.

    By this behavior he proved that Rev. K.T.Emanuel did not reveal the letter which we sent to him. It also proved that everyone in his office including the General Vicar Rev Bartol, also hid the facts from him. That his team never shares with him the grievances of the people of his Catholic church.

    What inference would you draw if you know that there has been so much of communication-written form sent to the Cardinal and his office, that the Cardinal says “He is not aware”

    He found it so difficult to give a day to meet him. But he has all the time in the world to file for a defamation case.

    WOW…….I LOVE THIS ATTITUDE…….
    I will not help you but you talk against me I shall sue you….fabulous teaching..

    no wonder we see this attitude running down the clergy of the catholic church and many of its people.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. February 26, 2014 at 5:38 pm

    DEAR RONEY, CARDINAL IS NOT A MAN OF WORD, HE IS UNABLE TO KEEP HIS WORD, UR RIGHT HE SHOULD RESIGN BUT HE IS SHAMELESS AND CARRIES ON, NOW HIS GREATEST AMBITION IS TO BE BUTERRING THE POPE AND BE AROUND HIM TO BE IN LIMELIGHT AND MAY BE HE IS LOOKING FORWARD TO BE THE NEXT POPE.

    Like


%d bloggers like this: